<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Population 3: How many â€œSaintsâ€ are there?  (A LOT!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.latterdaylogic.com/population-is-not-negative/population-series-part-3-how-many-%e2%80%9cmormons%e2%80%9d-or-%e2%80%9csaints%e2%80%9d-are-there-or-will-there-be/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.latterdaylogic.com/population-is-not-negative/population-series-part-3-how-many-%e2%80%9cmormons%e2%80%9d-or-%e2%80%9csaints%e2%80%9d-are-there-or-will-there-be/</link>
	<description>Logic and reason on a range of subjects flavored by Latter-day Saint theology.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arlen Humphrey</title>
		<link>http://www.latterdaylogic.com/population-is-not-negative/population-series-part-3-how-many-%e2%80%9cmormons%e2%80%9d-or-%e2%80%9csaints%e2%80%9d-are-there-or-will-there-be/#comment-9971</link>
		<dc:creator>Arlen Humphrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.latterdaylogic.com/?p=9#comment-9971</guid>
		<description>wkwuh22xtn8k84s7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wkwuh22xtn8k84s7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
